After weeks of doubt around stadium upgrades that will cost billions of dollars for the 2032 Olympics in Brisbane, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and local organizers sought on Wednesday to put the events in a more positive light.
You can read this too: Baseball’s Ohtani issue looms before opening day
This month, plans to reconstruct the historic Gabba cricket stadium as a centerpiece for the Olympics were scrapped after the anticipated cost skyrocketed. The stadium was supposed to be rebuilt at a cost of $2 billion. John Coates, the most important Olympic official in Australia, had stated that the stadium concerns in Brisbane’s home state of Queensland were detrimental to the Olympic image.
In light of the fact that state elections are scheduled to take place in October, Premier Steven Miles of Queensland has requested that the building of Olympic venues be reviewed. He has expressed his preference for upgrading an existing rugby stadium for the opening and closing ceremonies.
Earlier this week, the president of the International Olympic Committee, Thomas Bach, referred to reports that Queensland had investigated the possibility of withdrawing from its promise to host the Olympics as “fake news.”
As a result, the International Olympic Committee and local organizing authorities were questioned on Wednesday, following their yearly review of preparations, on the ways in which Queensland could be re-advised to fall in love with the games.
“I am not observing any alteration in that sensation,” insisted Kirsty Coventry, the member of the International Olympic Committee executive board who is in charge of the Brisbane project. She further stated that eight and a half years before to the games, “it is the time for changes to take place.”
Coventry and Andrew Liveris, who is the president of the organizing committee for Brisbane 2032, have often emphasized the importance of adhering to “due diligence” and adjusting to the requirements and preferences of the local populace and the authorities in charge of the city.
“At this very moment, the state government has provided us with venues, and we are going to work on that,” Liveris stated during a news conference that was held online.
One of the priorities of the International Olympic Committee, according to Coventry, who won two gold medals in the Olympics for Zimbabwe in the sport of swimming, is to ensure that “fields of play are world standard.”
“Once again, it is obviously dependent on what the people in the communities want, as well as how the region is growing,” she stated. We, as the International Olympic Committee, will not impose that on you. Because of this, we pay attention.
Problems with the stadium and efforts to reduce expenses have emerged as the most significant obstacle for Brisbane in the nearly three years that have passed since the Olympics were awarded in 2021, which is eleven years before the opening ceremony.
It was the first time that a favored contender was put into exclusive, fast-track talks without having to face a rival bidder in a vote. Brisbane was the first city to be selected as the host of the Summer Games under the new method. In addition to reducing the expenses associated with campaigning and the construction of venues, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) wanted to steer clear of the poll-buying controversies that plagued the Olympics held in Rio de Janeiro in 2016 and Tokyo in 2020.
An important ally of the International Olympic Committee, Vice President Coates, was rewarded for the victory in Brisbane, which was perceived as lacking transparency.
According to Coventry, “The giving and awarding of Brisbane up until now have actually been very good, and they have been very good learning experiences.”
About The Author
